MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081706679 · doi:10.1109/cec.2012.6256126

Single parent generalization of cellular automata rules

2012· article· en· W2081706679 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCellular Automata and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneralizationCellular automatonComputer scienceCrossoverAutomatonSet (abstract data type)Theoretical computer sciencePopulationFidelityEvolutionary computationMobile automatonEvolutionary algorithmMathematicsAutomata theoryArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generalization is a perennial issue in evolutionary computation. The ability of evolution to find excellent special-purpose solutions to a problem means that, in some cases, evolutionary techniques generalize poorly. In this study we demonstrate a system that generalizes apoptotic cellular automata rules from a small evaluation arena to a larger one. The generalization preserves many of the features of the cellular automata while increasing the size of the automata's time-history. The fidelity of the appearance of the generalized rules to their progenitors is high but varies for different progenitors. The generalization is attained by use of single parent techniques. These techniques employ a set of one or more immortal progenitors that are available for crossover but do not otherwise participate in the population. The form of single parent technique used here is novel and the study includes parameter tuning for its use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCellular Automata and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207