MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081739120 · doi:10.1515/icom.2013.0012

Motion-Based Game Interaction for Older Adults / Bewegungsbasierte Spielinteraktion für Senioren

2013· article· de· W2081739120 on OpenAlexafffund
Kathrin Gerling

Bibliographic record

Venuei-com · 2013
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology Use by Older Adults
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGynecologyArtMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zusammenfassung Bewegungsbasierte Videospiele für Senioren erfreuen sich immer größerer Beliebtheit, da sie eine geeignete Möglichkeit darstellen, ältere Menschen zu körperlicher Aktivität zu motivieren. In diesem Zusammenhang ist es wichtig zu gewährleisten, dass bewegungsbasierte Eingabegeräte für entsprechende Spiele leicht zugänglich sind, und dass Eingabeparadigmen kein Verletzungsrisiko für ältere Nutzer darstellen. Dieser Artikel gibt einen Überblick über traditionelle und bewegungsbasierte Spielinteraktion für Senioren, und zeigt Möglichkeiten auf, wie es gebrechlichen älteren Menschen ermöglicht werden kann, ihren Körper in den Interaktionsprozess einzubringen. Weiterhin fasst dieser Artikel potentielle Anwendungsfälle für bewegungsbasierte Spielinteraktion für Senioren zusammen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuei-comSame topicTechnology Use by Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207