MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081796443 · doi:10.1504/ijmheur.2011.041197

A particle swarm optimisation for fuzzy dynamic facility layout problem

2011· article· en· W2081796443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Metaheuristics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationComputer scienceFuzzy logicRanking (information retrieval)Mathematical optimizationProduct (mathematics)Order (exchange)Service (business)Operations researchAlgorithmEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic facility layout problem (DFLP) deals with arranging and rearranging the layout plan of a manufacturing system or a service provider throughout several periods. In each period, the material handling costs are different from the previous periods due to the change in the market demand and product mix. Since the problem is NP-hard, numerous approaches have been proposed in the literature in order to find near-optimum solutions of the DFLP. In this paper, we model the natural uncertainty in material handling costs with fuzzy theory. A fuzzy particle swarm optimisation (FPSO) algorithm is proposed to solve the problem. We implement a number of ranking criteria from the literature in order to test the performance of the developed algorithm. Computational results confirm the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it