MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2081799101 · doi:10.4021//jmc.v4i6.1283

Hand Monoparesis Due to Small Cortical Ischemic Stroke, Etiology, Prognosis and Medical Management: Case Report and Literature Review

2013· article· en· W2081799101 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paula Eboli, Asma Moheet, Shlee Song, Robert W. Ryan, Michael J. Alexander

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWeaknessCarotid endarterectomyEtiologyStroke (engine)StenosisFacial weaknessCardiologyInfarctionInternal medicineSurgeryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the case of a 70-year-old male who presented to Cedars Sinai Emergency room with sudden onset of right hand weakness. Only a few cases of hand weakness due to a small cortical stroke have been previously reported. Brain MRI showed acute small, ischemic infarction in the left right precentral gyrus and CTA showed 75% stenosis at the origin of the left internal carotid. After discussing possible risks and benefits, he received IV rTPA and underwent subsequent carotid endarterectomy a few days later. Our paper highlights the importance of considering small cortical strokes in patients with sudden onset of hand weakness since these patients may benefit from IV administration of rTPA and early intervention to treat embolic source and prevent future ischemic events. J Med Cases. 2013;4(6):429-432 doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jmc1283w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Cases→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→