MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081804488 · doi:10.1002/cmr.a.20062

The hydrogen atom, revisited: Parallel‐field magnetic resonance

2006· article· en· W2081804488 on OpenAlex
John A. Weil

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConcepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryUniversity of ChicagoPrinceton University
KeywordsExcitationHydrogen atomPerpendicularAtom (system on chip)Atomic physicsMagnetic fieldHydrogenSpin (aerodynamics)Field (mathematics)Resonance (particle physics)Line (geometry)Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopySpectroscopyNuclear magnetic resonanceChemistryCondensed matter physicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsGroup (periodic table)MathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Consideration of the magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the free hydrogen atom ( 1 H 0 ) reveals that, in addition to the well‐known transitions (EPR and NMR) occurring between the four spin states when the excitation magnetic field B 1 is perpendicular to the static external field B , there exists a combination line (simultaneous electronic and nuclear spin flips) when B 1 ∥ B , which becomes strong under some circumstances. The latter phenomenon is focused on and discussed herein, in some detail. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Concepts Magn Reson Part A 28A: 331–336, 2006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it