MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081808964 · doi:10.1142/s0218216509006793

OPEN-CLOSED TQFTS EXTEND KHOVANOV HOMOLOGY FROM LINKS TO TANGLES

2009· article· en· W2081808964 on OpenAlexaff
Aaron D. Lauda, Hendryk Pfeiffer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric and Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKhovanov homologyMathematicsTangleHomology (biology)Pure mathematicsFloer homologyKnot theoryKnot (papermaking)Topology (electrical circuits)CombinatoricsAlgebra over a fieldGeneticsBiologyAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use a special kind of 2-dimensional extended Topological Quantum Field Theories (TQFTs), so-called open-closed TQFTs, in order to represent a refinement of Bar-Natan's universal geometric complex algebraically, and thereby extend Khovanov homology from links to arbitrary tangles. For every plane diagram of an oriented tangle, we construct a chain complex whose terms are modules of a suitable algebra A such that there is one action of A or A op for every boundary point of the tangle. We give examples of such algebras A for which our tangle homology theory reduces to the link homology theories of Khovanov, Lee and Bar-Natan if it is evaluated for links. As a consequence of the Cardy condition, Khovanov's graded theory can only be extended to tangles if the underlying field has finite characteristic. Whenever the open-closed TQFT arises from a state-sum construction, we obtain honest planar algebra morphisms, and all composition properties of the universal geometric complex carry over to the algebraic complex. We give examples of state-sum open-closed TQFTs for which one can still determine both characteristic p Khovanov homology of links and Rasmussen's s-invariant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Knot Theory and Its RamificationsSame topicGeometric and Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207