MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081833206 · doi:10.1109/tit.2011.2177579

Single-Sample Robust Joint Source–Channel Coding: Achieving Asymptotically Optimum Scaling of SDR Versus SNR

2012· article· en· W2081833206 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompandingMathematicsDecoding methodsAdditive white Gaussian noiseDecibelGaussianChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the problem of zero-delay (encoding a single-source sample) robust joint source-channel coding over an additive white Gaussian noise channel. We propose a new scheme that, unlike previously known coding schemes, achieves the optimal scaling of the source signal-to-distortion ratio (SDR) versus channel signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Also, we propose a family of robust codes, which together maintain a bounded gap with the optimum SDR curve (in terms of decibel). To show the importance of this result, we derive some theoretical bounds on the asymptotic performance of a widely used class of delay-limited hybrid digital-analog (HDA) coding schemes based on superposition of analog and digital components. We show that, unlike the delay-unlimited case, for this class of delay-limited HDA codes, the asymptotic performance loss is unbounded (in terms of decibels). Although the main focus of this paper is on uniform sources, it is also shown that the results are also valid for a more general class of well-behaved distributions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it