MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Grain structure and texture in aluminium alloy AA5083 after equal angular channel extrusion, warm rolling and subsequent annealing

2010· article· en· W2081850053 on OpenAlexaff
H. Jin, M. Gallerneault, V. M. Segal, Phillip J Young, D. J. Lloyd

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Science and Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMicrostructure and mechanical properties
Canadian institutionsNovelis (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceEquiaxed crystalsAnnealing (glass)Equal channel angular extrusionExtrusionAluminiumMetallurgyAlloyTransmission electron microscopyGrain sizeAluminium alloyScanning electron microscopeComposite materialCrystallographyNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An aluminium alloy AA5083, having a submicrometre grain structure generated by equal angular channel extrusion, was rolled at ∼200°C to make flat sheets with 37·5 to 75% thickness reductions. The evolution of grain structure and texture upon warm rolling and subsequent annealing was studied by transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction technique. It has been demonstrated that dynamic recovery occurs during the warm rolling, the submicrometre grain structure could be retained with low rolling reduction, but as the reduction increases it develops into a cell structure, and after subsequent annealing, an equiaxed fine grain structure of ∼5 μm mean size is obtained which is thermally stable at temperature as high as 500°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials Science and TechnologySame topicMicrostructure and mechanical propertiesFrench-language works237,207