Strategic Targeting of Essential Host-pathogen Interactions in Chlamydial Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chlamydiae are obligate intracellular gram-negative bacteria that are exquisitely adapted for exploitation of their hosts and contribute to a wide range of acute and chronic human diseases. Acute infections treated with non-cidal antibiotics can lead to the development of persistent, non-replicating bacteria with the corollary that these persistent (yet viable) chlamydiae can resist eradication by further antimicrobial treatment and cause chronic disease. These findings highlight an urgent need for therapeutics that are effective against persistent infections and call for creative approaches to identify potential drug targets. The C. pneumoniae and C. trachomatis genome projects have greatly expanded our knowledge of chlamydial pathogenesis and have provided an enormous potential for the identification and characterization of unknown genes and potential virulence factors in these bacteria. As intracellular pathogens, chlamydiae rely on host cells for all aspects of their survival, from the initial attachment with host cell membranes, to cellular invasion, acquisition of host cell metabolites and intracellular replication. As such, the molecules participating in interactions with the host could be attractive targets for therapeutic intervention. This review describes recent advances in chlamydial genomics, proteomics and cell biology that have cast light on host-pathogen relations that are essential for chlamydial survival. Using this knowledge, we discuss how strategically interfering with essential interactions between chlamydiae and the host cell could be exploited to develop an innovative, and potentially more relevant arsenal of therapeutic compounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".