MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081853000 · doi:10.1002/jrs.2769

Raman microspectroscopic evidence that dry‐fixing preserves the temporal pattern of non‐specific differentiation in live human embryonic stem cells

2010· article· en· W2081853000 on OpenAlexafffund
S. O. Konorov, H. Georg Schulze, Nicolas Caron, James M. Piret, Michael W. Blades, Robin F. B. Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Raman Spectroscopy · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRaman spectroscopyEmbryonic stem cellNucleic acidStem cellChemistryRNABiologyBiophysicsCell biologyMolecular biologyBiochemistryOpticsPhysicsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Raman microspectroscopy allows the classification of populations of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in different stages of differentiation based on the relative intensities of certain amino acid and nucleic acid bands. Here, we report the results of a comparative study of the Raman spectra of live cells versus cells killed and fixed by rapid desiccation, focusing on the ratio of intensities at 757 cm −1 (tryptophan) and 784 cm −1 (DNA and RNA). We observe that the same temporal pattern emerges over a 3‐week time course in both sample types. This suggests that prolonged observations of dry‐fixed cells can yield high signal‐to‐noise chemical images that cannot be obtained from colonies of living cells where the time scale of significant biological changes are comparable to the time scale of the measurement. This permits, for example, comparison of the spatial distributions of cells at different stages of differentiation within the same colonies. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.813

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Raman SpectroscopySame topicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207