MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Synthesis of polyimides and segmented block copolyimides by transimidization

2000· article· en· W2081873161 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSynthesis and properties of polymers
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonomerPolyimideImideCopolymerPolymer chemistryPolymerizationGlass transitionChemistryMaterials sciencePolymerOrganic chemistryLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transimidization reaction has been successfully utilized to prepare a series of segmented block copolyimides. The synthesis and polymerization of an AX-type amino imide monomer containing the tetrahydro[5]helicene unit were accomplished. The AX-type amino imide monomer is stable during isolation and purification, owing to its inert X (e.g., N-pyridyl) group, but yet readily underwent a self-transimidization reaction and produced polyimide. Because of the presence of two reactive ends, such an AX-type polyimide could be incorporated into a series of block copolyimides by reaction with commercially available dianhydrides and diamines. All the copolymers showed two distinct glass-transition temperatures, typically around 250 and 430 °C. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 3991–3996, 2000

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it