Fibromuscular dysplasia of the coronary and renal arteries?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) involving the coronary arteries has been described pathologically as a cause of myocardial infarction but has not been described antemortem. Unlike renal artery FMD, its clinical manifestations remain poorly characterized. We describe demographic, clinical, and coronary angiographic characteristics of seven women with acute coronary syndromes and unusual coronary anatomy who also had renal artery FMD. All subjects were female caucasians, age 42-56, who presented with prolonged chest pain and positive troponin tests. Two were smokers, two had hypertension, and one had hypercholesterolemia. None was diabetic. There were distinctive angiographic features common to all seven patients. The left anterior descending artery was involved in six, the right posterior descending artery in one. In each case, the proximal vessel appeared normal but in the middle or distal segment there was a well-demarcated abrupt transition to diffuse obliterative disease. In six of the cases, this continued distally for the remainder of the epicardial vessel. In no case was revascularization feasible. Unlike severe diffuse atherosclerotic disease, all other coronary segments were angiographically normal. Ventricular dysfunction, if present, was mild. All seven patients had typical angiographic features of renal FMD, three bilaterally. We have observed a characteristic pattern of well-demarcated obliterative coronary artery disease associated with FMD of the renal arteries. All cases presented as acute coronary syndromes in patients at relatively low risk of coronary artery disease. We propose that these appearances in the epicardial arteries, previously undescribed ante-mortem represent coronary artery fibromuscular dysplasia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".