MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081893593 · doi:10.1142/s0217979203021447

Verification of Nodeless Superconducting Pairing in Single-Crystal <font>YBa</font><sub>2</sub><font>Cu</font><sub>3</sub><font>O</font><sub>7</sub>

2003· article· en· W2081893593 on OpenAlexafffund
Dale R. Harshman, W. J. Kossler, X. Wan, A. T. Fiory, A. J. Greer, D. R. Noakes, C. E. Stronach, E. Köster, A. Erb, John D. Dow

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics B · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersTRIUMF
KeywordsPairingPhysicsSuperconductivityCondensed matter physicsFontVortexLattice (music)Single crystalNuclear magnetic resonanceThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The temperature and field dependence of the penetration depth was determined from muon spin rotation (μ + SR ) measurements on a single crystal of YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7 having a superconducting transition at T c ≈ 91.3 K . Data were acquired at applied magnetic fields of 0.05, 1.0, 3.0, and 6.0 Tesla, yielding results inconsistent with any pairing state requiring nodes, including d-wave pairing. These data are, however, completely consistent with s-wave (or extended s-wave) superconductivity, with clear evidence of field-dependent, temperature-activated vortex pinning. Our results confirm the s-wave character originally observed in 1989, and show that the features of μ + SR (and microwave) data used by other authors as evidence for d-wave superconductivity are instead due to temperature- and field-dependent vortex pinning/reordering, resulting in significant distortion of the flux lattice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.006
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics BSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207