MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081900277 · doi:10.1002/mop.27659

Beam tilting of single microstrip antenna using high permittivity superstrate

2013· article· en· W2081900277 on OpenAlex
Hussein Attia, Omar Siddiqui, Omar M. Ramahi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostrip antennaOpticsMicrostripMicrowaveMaterials sciencePatch antennaBeam (structure)Radiation patternBeam steeringDielectricAntenna (radio)OptoelectronicsPhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Antenna beam tilting or steering requires multiple antenna elements to be phase shifted and arranged in the form of an array. This article presents a novel method to tilt the main beam of a microstrip patch by partially covering it with a high dielectric‐constant superstrate. The beam tilting is possible because of the dual‐slot radiation mechanism of the microstrip antenna. In effect, the electromagnetic radiation from the covered radiating slot reaches the far‐field with an additional phase with respect to the uncovered slot, resulting in an inclined beam whose angle depends on the superstrate's refractive index. Experimentally and numerically, a beam deflection of 25° is achieved when a microstrip patch is partially covered with a superstrate having a dielectric constant of 10. Moreover, the proposed structure provides gain enhancement of about 3 dB. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 55:1657–1661, 2013; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/mop.27659

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it