MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2081950725 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000432

The galactic plane region near $\mathsf{\ell=93^\circ}$

2001· article· en· W2081950725 on OpenAlexafffundabout
T. Foster, D. Routledge

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversity of CalgarySmithsonian Institution
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalactic planeStarsLine (geometry)BrightnessMolecular cloudHydrogen lineEmission spectrumH II regionAstronomyOutflowSpectral lineStar formationGalaxyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present new Canadian Galactic Plane Survey radio continuum and 21 cm H I line observations of NRAO 655 (G93.4+1.8), plus radio recombination line observations, and optical H-line observations. The radio spectrum of NRAO 655 confirms its emission as thermal. From the 21 cm H I data we find an atomic hydrogen cavity associated with this object at km s. The cavity corresponds in position and size to the brightest radio continuum emission from NRAO 655. The corresponding kinematic distance is 8.8 kpc, placing NRAO 655 in the Perseus Arm. NRAO 655's linear size is therefore 70 pc 130 pc. To confirm the 21 cm H I velocity we present the first recombination line detection of NRAO 655 (H158 line, km s), and the first observations of a molecular cloud coinciding with NRAO 655 (at km s). The first optical detection of 656 nm H emission line features in NRAO 655 is also presented, and the H emission line brightness is determined. We suggest that the eastward extension of this strongly asymmetric object originates in a champagne outflow, and we estimate its age. We show that a single early-type star cannot be responsible for the outflow, whereas a group of later-type stars would suffice. A partial H I shell is seen adjacent to the brightest part of NRAO 655; we suggest that it has been formed by dissociation of H in the molecular cloud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→