A PROMOÇÃO DA SAÚDE NAS PRÁTICAS EDUCATIVAS DA SAÚDE DA FAMÍLIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pesquisa qualitativa com o objetivo de identificar e analisar como as principais ações de Promoção da Saúde – estabelecidas pela Carta de Ottawa – estão sendo trabalhadas nas práticas educativas de equipes de Saúde da Família de um Centro de Saúde do Município de Florianópolis, Santa Catarina. Para a coleta e análise dos dados foi utilizado o itinerário de pesquisa de Paulo Freire, em 16 círculos de cultura realizados com usuários e profissionais. Os resultados apontaram que a incorporação dos princípios da Carta de Ottawa permanece distante da prática concreta dos profissionais, especialmente devido à sustentação do modelo biomédico, predominante no setor saúde. Salienta-se a importância da atuação das equipes numa perspectiva interdisciplinar e dialógica, que estimule a participação do usuário para que, em conjunto com os profissionais, construam uma prática de saúde mais emancipatória e autônoma sobre os determinantes do processo saúde e doença.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".