MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082006506 · doi:10.1139/e01-066

Seawater composition during deposition of Viséan evaporites in the Moncton Subbasin of New Brunswick as inferred from the fluid inclusion study of halite

2002· article· en· W2082006506 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Oleh Y. Petrychenko, Tadeusz Marek Peryt, Brian Roulston

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Canadian institutionsPotashCorp (Canada)
FundersUniwersytet Marii Curie-SkłodowskiejNational Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
KeywordsEvaporiteHaliteGeologyGeochemistryAnhydriteDiagenesisFluid inclusionsSeawaterPotashInclusion (mineral)MineralogyStructural basinPaleontologyGypsumSedimentary rockHydrothermal circulationChemistryOceanographyPotassium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Viséan evaporites of the Windsor Group in the Moncton Subbasin at the western limit of the Maritimes Basin of eastern Canada represent an important stratigraphic sequence to study in determining changes in the chemistry of marine brines. Seventeen samples of halite have been selected for fluid inclusion study. The chemical composition of inclusion brines was examined using the Petrichenko method of glass capillaries with applied ultramicroanalytical techniques. The results of the study indicate that the conditions of evaporite deposition in the Windsor Basin differed from those recorded in other Phanerozoic basins and that the history of the Windsor Basin brines was characterized by changes in the chemical composition of the brines. It was also found that there existed continual unfavourable conditions for the day-and-night zonality in chevron halite crystals and for the origin of relatively large (>50 µm) fluid inclusions and that the gas content was low not only during the deposition but also during the diagenesis of potash deposits. The chemical composition of the Viséan waters of the Moncton Subbasin at the beginning and end of deposition of the Windsor Group evaporite sequence was controlled by the predominating waters of nonmarine origin; during the potash deposition the controlling factor was chloride-type marine waters. In general, the geochemical data support the concept of Carboniferous evaporite basins with Na–K–Mg–Ca–Cl-type brines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryFrench-language works237,207