MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082023491 · doi:10.1063/1.1468218

Generic van der Waals equation of state and theory of diffusion coefficients: Binary mixtures of simple liquids

2002· article· en· W2082023491 on OpenAlexafffund
Kyunil Rah, Byung Chan Eu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsKryptonvan der Waals forceThermodynamicsArgonVan der Waals equationDiffusionChemistryEquation of stateBinary numberMonte Carlo methodHard spheresSelf-diffusionVolume (thermodynamics)Work (physics)PhysicsMoleculeStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A free volume theory of diffusion coefficients is formulated for binary mixtures of simple liquids. The free volume is defined by means of the generic van der Waals equation of state for mixtures, which is developed in this work, and computed in terms of the pair correlation function obtained by means of Monte Carlo simulations with a square-well potential model. The free volume thus computed is used to investigate the composition and temperature dependence of the binary diffusion coefficient of argon–krypton mixtures as well as the tracer diffusion coefficients of argon in liquid nitrogen and krypton in liquid argon. The present theoretical predictions compare very well with the experimental or simulation results available in the literature. The size and mass dependence of the ratio of the tracer diffusion to the solvent self-diffusion coefficients is also presented. This ratio is found to be almost independent of temperature and density. It therefore can be used to calculate the tracer diffusion coefficient from the self-diffusion coefficient and vice versa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207