MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082032709 · doi:10.1021/ie020335k

Adsorption of Silver onto Activated Carbon from Acidic Media:  Nitrate and Sulfate Media

2002· article· en· W2082032709 on OpenAlexaff
Yongfeng Jia, George P. Demopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdsorptionChemistryInorganic chemistrySulfateZincActivated carbonHydroquinoneSilver nitrateCarbon fibersNitrateNuclear chemistryOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adsorption of silver from acidic silver nitrate and sulfate media onto a peat-based activated carbon was studied. The effects of pH, temperature, and zinc nitrate and zinc sulfate addition on the adsorption kinetics and capacities were investigated. An XRD study showed that Ag(I) was reduced to Ag(0) on the carbon surface during the adsorption process. Low pH, high zinc salt concentration, and temperature are detrimental to the adsorption of silver. Second-order reactions were involved in the process of silver adsorption with respect to Ag(I). Hydroquinone-like surface oxygen functional groups were probably involved in the reduction reaction of Ag(I) → Ag(0). The addition of butanol to the solution appreciably reduced the adsorption rate and capacity of silver on the activated carbon. This indicates that graphene layer surfaces might also be involved in the Ag(I) → Ag(0) reaction because of the enrichment of π-electrons on the basal planes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalFrench-language works237,207