MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082041721 · doi:10.1149/1.1393889

The Reaction of Lithium with Sn-Mn-C Intermetallics Prepared by Mechanical Alloying

2000· article· en· W2082041721 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced materials and composites
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie University
KeywordsIntermetallicMaterials scienceElectrochemistryLithium (medication)TinTernary operationPhase (matter)Grain boundaryChemical engineeringMetallurgyAlloyElectrodeInorganic chemistryMicrostructureChemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intermetallic phases and mixtures of intermetallic phases in the Sn‐Mn‐C ternary system were prepared by mechanical alloying. The reaction of lithium with these phases was studied using in situ X‐ray diffraction and electrochemical methods. Studies concentrated on , , , and . Nanoscale two‐phase mixtures of and were also prepared and studied. When is mixed with sufficient amounts of a second phase, electrodes capable of delivering over 200 mAh/g for more than 50 cycles can be prepared. Grain boundary tin atoms in nanostructured appear to be able to react reversibly with lithium for hundreds of cycles. © 2000 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it