MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082042127 · doi:10.1021/ie061666q

Pretreatment of Liquid Silicone Rubbers to Remove Volatile Siloxanes

2007· article· en· W2082042127 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael A. Brook, Hanns-Ulrich Saier, Julia Schnabel, Kaitlin Town, Michael J. Maloney

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicone and Siloxane Chemistry
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsSiliconeElastomerMaterials scienceSilicone ElastomersComposite materialSilicone oilCuring (chemistry)Thermal stabilityChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liquid silicone rubbers (LSR) are widely used to create devices with complex shapes for various commercial and consumer applications, because of their many beneficial properties including lubricity, thermal and electrical stability, and aesthetic feel. Regulatory bodies require postcure thermal treatment of silicone elastomers to remove volatile materials: the rate and efficiency of these processes depends on the specific elastomer properties (e.g., cross-link density). We examine in this paper the ability to remove volatiles before curing in the mold, a process that should be much less dependent on specific elastomer formulation. The thermal devolatilization efficiency, optionally under vacuum, of silicone elastomers prior to cure, was compared to different convection heating techniques postcure. Parts A (olefin-functional silicone and the catalyst) and B (Si−H functional silicone) were treated separately or mixed, and the ability to create parts and the requirement for postcure thermal devolatization (200 °C for 4 h) were determined. Themolysis precure permitted the removal of volatile species, but with several key caveats: (i) Loss of volatiles from part B, in particular, was accompanied (especially in moist atmospheres) by premature cure, likely due to cure mechanisms other than hydrosilylation and the thermal loss of inhibitors. Even without part A, the part B samples skinned over after a few hours. (ii) The pot life significantly decreased, particularly as volatiles were removed from part B. (iii) The efficiency of devolatilization can be detrimentally affected by transpiration the migration of volatiles from one silicone elastomer object to another via contact or gas-phase transfer. Thinner objects both lost and absorbed volatiles by contact and evapotranspiration more effectively than thicker objects. Precure treatment had little effect on the resulting elastomer properties. To establish if precure thermolysis is a viable route to devolatilization, it was determined that the surface/volume ratio of the object to be prepared should be considered, as this takes into account the relative proportion of both thin and thick sections of the complex object to be molded. In the case that the object consists primarily of thick objects, precure devolatilization of part A can be an effective way to mitigate the need for postcure thermal treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicSilicone and Siloxane ChemistryFrench-language works237,207