MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082072849 · doi:10.1063/1.3503447

A simple proof of Birkhoff's theorem for cosmological constant

2010· article· en· W2082072849 on OpenAlexaff
Kristin Schleich, Donald Witt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCosmological constantSchwarzschild radiusDe Sitter universeSimple (philosophy)Mathematical physicsConstant (computer programming)PhysicsUniquenessSchwarzschild metricCorollaryMathematicsGeneral relativityPure mathematicsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisUniverseQuantum mechanicsGravitationPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide a simple, unified proof of Birkhoff’s theorem for the vacuum and cosmological constant case, emphasizing its local nature. We discuss its implications for the maximal analytic extensions of Schwarzschild, Schwarzschild(–anti)-de Sitter, and Nariai spacetimes. In particular, we note that the maximal analytic extensions of extremal and overextremal Schwarzschild–de Sitter spacetimes exhibit no static region. Hence the common belief that Birkhoff’s theorem implies staticity is false for the case of positive cosmological constant. Instead, the correct point of view is that generalized Birkhoff’s theorems are local uniqueness theorems whose corollary is that locally spherically symmetric solutions of Einstein’s equations exhibit an additional local Killing vector field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207