MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082160157 · doi:10.7202/015488ar

Un système crow patrilinéaire. Les Dìì de Mbé (Adamaoua, Nord-Cameroun). Essai de triangulation méthodologique

2003· article· fr· W2082160157 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jean-Claude Müller

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÉSUMÉ Un système crow patrilinéaire : les Dîî de Mbé lAdamaoua. Nord-Cameroun) Essai de triangulation méthodologique Cet article examine le système terminologique crow des Diî de l'Adamaoua. Bien que patrilinéaires. les Diî ont un système terminologique normalement associé à un régime matrilinéaire. Cette exception s'explique très bien en fonction des coutumes dii. mais elle ne s'explique pas par la théorie anthropologique générale. Cependant, une analyse qui concilie la théorie dîi. la théorie générale et le contexte régional rend compte de tous les faits qui confirment la théorie générale et font des Dii une simple variation locale d'un schème plus orthodoxe. Mots clés : Muller. parenté/terminologie, parenté/théorie, systèmes crow-omaha. Cameroun. Adamaoua

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207