Tissue-Specific Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Cell Wall Metabolism, Flavonol Biosynthesis and Defense Responses are Activated in the Endosperm of Germinating Arabidopsis thaliana Seeds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seed germination is a result of the competition of embryonic growth potential and mechanical constraint by surrounding tissues such as the endosperm. To understand the processes occurring in the endosperm during germination, we analyzed tiling array expression data on dissected endosperm and embryo from 6 and 24 h-imbibed Arabidopsis seeds. The genes preferentially expressed in the endosperm of both 6 and 24 h-imbibed seeds were enriched for those related to cell wall biosynthesis/modifications, flavonol biosynthesis, defense responses and cellular transport. Loss of function of AtXTH31/XTR8, an endosperm-specific gene for a putative xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolase, led to faster germination. This suggests that AtXTH31/XTR8 is involved in the reinforcement of the cell wall of the endosperm during germination. In vivo flavonol staining by diphenyl boric acid aminoethyl ester (DPBA) showed flavonols accumulated in the endosperm of both dormant and non-dormant seeds, suggesting that this event is independent of germination. Notably, DPBA fluorescence was also intense in the embryo, but the fluorescent region was diminished around the radicle and lower half of the hypocotyl during germination. DPBA fluorescence was localized in the vacuoles during germination. Vacuolation was not seen in imbibed dormant seeds, suggesting that vacuolation is associated with germination. A gene for δVPE (vacuolar processing enzyme), a caspase-1-like cysteine proteinase involved in cell death, is expressed specifically in endosperms of 24 h-imbibed seeds. The δvpe mutant showed retardation of vacuolation, but this mutation did not affect the kinetics of germination. This suggests that vacuolation is a consequence, and not a trigger, of germination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".