MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082188316 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450830108

Flow Uniformity in a Model Digester Measured with Electrical Resistance Tomography

2008· article· en· W2082188316 on OpenAlexaffvenue
D. Vlaev, Chad P. J. Bennington

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsFlow resistanceHumanitiesFlow (mathematics)MechanicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to create uniform liquor flow in the counter-current zones of a continuous digester was studied in the laboratory using a 40L model digester equipped with an eight-plane electrical resistance tomography (ERT) sensor array. Conductively tagged fluid flows were visualized moving through a stationary bed of uncooked wood chips for a range of process flow conditions. Simulations using scaled axial (upflow) and downcomer-screen (radial) flows were used to model the counter-current zones in two industrial digesters. These were compared with flow patterns obtained by varying the ratio of upflow to downcomer-screen flow over a wider range. The optimal flow ratios and fluxes are discussed with regard to radial and vertical zone uniformity. La capacité à créer un écoulement de liqueur uniforme dans les zones à contre-courant d'un digesteur continu a été étudiée en laboratoire à l'aide d'un digesteur modèle de 40 L muni d'une grille de capteurs de tomographie à résistance électrique (ERT) sur huit plans. Des écoulements de fluides marqués de façon conductrice ont été visualisés lors de leur déplacement dans un lit stationnaire de copeaux de bois non cuits pour une gamme de conditions d'écoulement de procédé. On a utilisé des simulations utilisant des écoulements axiaux (ascendants) et des écoulements déversoir-tamis (radiaux) mis à l'échelle afin de modéliser les zones à contre-courant dans deux digesteurs industriels. Ces données ont été comparées à des profils d'écoulement obtenus en variant le rapport entre l'écoulement ascendant et l'écoulement déversoir-tamis sur une large gamme. Les débits et flux optimums sont examinés pour ce qui est de l'uniformité des zones radiale et verticale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.152
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyFrench-language works237,207