MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082192169 · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2013.2283502

A Fully-Asynchronous Low-Power Implantable Seizure Detector for Self-Triggering Treatment

2013· article· en· W2082192169 on OpenAlexafffund
Marjan Mirzaei, Muhammad Tariqus Salam, Dang Khoa Nguyen, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCMC Microsystems
KeywordsAsynchronous communicationDetectorComputer scienceCMOSChipElectroencephalographyElectronic engineeringEpileptic seizureSensitivity (control systems)EpilepsyComputer hardwareEngineeringNeurosciencePsychologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a new asynchronous seizure detector that is part of an implantable integrated device intended to identify electrographic seizure onset and trigger a focal treatment to block the seizure progression. The proposed system has a low-power front-end bioamplifier and a seizure detector with intelligent mechanism to reduce power dissipation. This system eliminates the unnecessary clock gating during normal neural activity monitoring mode and reduces power dissipation in the seizure detector; as a result, this device is suitable for long-term implantable applications. The proposed system includes analog and digital building blocks with programmable parameters for extracting electrographic seizure onset information from real-time EEG recordings. Sensitivity of the detector is enhanced by optimizing the variable parameters based on specific electrographic seizure onset activities of each patient. The detection algorithm was validated using Matlab tools and implemented in standard 0.13 μm CMOS process with total die area of 1.5 × 1.5 mm². The fabricated chip is validated offline using intracranial EEG recordings from two patients with refractory epilepsy. Total power consumption of the chip is 9 μW and average detection delay is 13.7 s after seizure onset, well before the onset of clinical manifestation. The proposed system achieves an accurate detection performance with 100% sensitivity and no false alarms during the analyses of 15 seizures and 19 non-seizure datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and SystemsSame topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207