MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082195435 · doi:10.1139/t01-035

Effect of zeolitization on physicochemico-mineralogical and geotechnical properties of lagoon ash

2001· article· en· W2082195435 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Prabir K. Kolay, Devendra Narain Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoal and Its By-products
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBottom ashConsolidation (business)Fly ashCompactionGeotechnical engineeringSlurryGeologyHydraulic conductivityEnvironmental scienceWaste managementSoil waterEnvironmental engineeringSoil scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A common method to dispose of ash generated from coal-fired thermal power plants is to mix the ash with water and place the ash–water slurry in ponds or lagoons. Such a disposal system allows for the ash–water interaction. Alkalis present in the ash react with water, leading to zeolitization of the ash and changes in its overall properties. To simulate such interaction, controlled experiments have been conducted on a typical Indian lagoon ash, and the effect of zeolitization on the physicochemico–mineralogical properties has been studied. The effect of zeolitization on the geotechnical properties of the ash has also been investigated in detail. It is believed that such investigations are essential for bulk utilization of the lagoon ash, particularly as a fill material, where properties like compaction, consolidation, and hydraulic conductivity are very important.Key words: lagoon ash, physical properties, chemical composition, mineralogy, geotechnical characteristics, zeolitization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicCoal and Its By-productsFrench-language works237,207