MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082219663 · doi:10.1159/000046198

The Natural History of Leukocyturia Associated with Indinavir Treatment in HIV+ Individuals

2000· article· en· W2082219663 on OpenAlexaff
Raymonde F. Gagnon, Sandy N. Tecimer, Andrew Watters, George Hatzakis, Christos Tsoukas

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Nephrology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndinavirCrystalluriaMedicineUrinalysisAsymptomaticInternal medicineKidney diseaseUrinary systemMicrohematuriaGastroenterologyProspective cohort studyUrologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)SidaKidneyImmunologyViral diseaseProteinuria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urinary complications observed during indinavir treatment of HIV disease are often attributed to indinavir crystalluria. In a prospective study of urinalysis during the first year of indinavir therapy, 5 of 54 asymptomatic HIV+ individuals presented severe leukocyturia (> or =100 cells/HPF) usually accompanying indinavir crystalluria. The clinical course of these 5 individuals, successfully treated for HIV and monitored for an second follow-up year, suggests that recurrence of severe leukocyturia may be an indicator of renal damage, likely tubulointerstitial disease caused by indinavir crystalluria. This is in contrast to the remaining 49 subjects, including those presenting mild leukocyturia, who did not demonstrate any evidence of renal disease. Regular urinalysis is therefore recommended in the clinical management of indinavir-treated individuals to detect early renal damage secondary to indinavir crystalluria and to prevent further renal impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of NephrologySame topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207