MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082224842 · doi:10.1353/cri.0.0171

Unexpected Affinities: Reading Across Cultures (review)

2008· article· en· W2082224842 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven Shankman

Bibliographic record

VenueChina review international · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)Theme (computing)ZhàngLiteratureHistorySociologyPhilosophyChinaArtLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Unexpected Affinities: Reading Across Cultures Steven Shankman (bio) Zhang Longxi . Unexpected Affinities: Reading Across Cultures. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. xv, 138 pp. Hardcover $29.95, ISBN 978-0-8020-9277-9. This is a wide-ranging book, written in a lively and accessible style, by a formidable scholar of cross-cultural comparative literature. As Zhang rightfully laments, today's academic world is far more comfortable with literary critics who adhere to the shibboleth of the absoluteness of cultural difference than with those who see connections between cultures, especially between cultures as different as China and the West. Zhang Longxi, in contrast, argues that "the point of reading across cultures is to reach a truly global vision of human creativity" because "only from such a broad perspective can we fully appreciate literary works and forms in all their diversities, and appreciate them not as isolated monads sealed off from one another, but as expressions of themes and ideas that are deeply connected, even though manifested in different languages and cultures" (p. 37). In the field of literary and cultural studies in our deeply historicizing academy these days, almost universally wary of universalism, Zhang's claim is both heterodox and welcome. Unexpected Affinities is based upon a series of Alexander Lectures Zhang delivered at the University of Toronto in 2005. On the one hand, the theme of Zhang's lectures—a vision of unity behind appearances of multiplicity—is true to the tradition of Northrop Frye, the Canadian critic who taught at the University of Toronto and whose archetypal approach to literary criticism saw all of literature as participating in a single grand vision, or system. On the other hand, Zhang's contribution is atypical of the Alexander Lectures, as he is the first critic from Asia to deliver them. As broad as was Frye's vision in elaborating his paradigm of archetypal criticism, the Canadian critic made no mention of any of the great classics of Asian literature. Chapter 1, "The Fallacy of Cultural Incommensurability," convincingly argues that East and West are not incommensurable opposites, that there are a great variety of opinions on many topics expressed in each of these two traditions, and that some figures from the East have more in common with their Western counterparts than they do with many of their fellow Easterners. One of these opinions expressed by some in both the Far East and the West is that East and West are incommensurable opposites. The fact that the case for incommensurability finds expression in both China and the West, Zhang argues, paradoxically invalidates that very case, since this contention is put forward by both Chinese and Western thinkers. In European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, the great comparatist E. R. Curtius, in arguing for the importance of seeing European literature as a whole, likened his own approach to taking an aerial photograph of the landscape he explores (European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, trans. Willard R. Trask [New York: Bollingen Foundation, 1953], p. ix). Zhang chooses the image of standing back from a canvas (which [End Page 310] he adapts from Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays [Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961], p. 140) or high up on a ladder in order to gain an appropriate perspective on the abundant variety of the world's literary texts. Chapter 2, "'Faire une perle d'une l'arme': Reading Across Cultures," finds striking, remarkably detailed similarities in the way Chinese and Western European poets viewed their poems as oysters' pearls—things of beauty that are, in fact, produced, like the oyster's pearl, as a by-product of considerable discomfort and suffering. These affinities are indeed unexpected and, therefore, striking. Readers might, however, find less arresting and original the similarities Zhang finds between Eastern and Western views of life as a journey. In his famous essay "Plato's Pharmacy," Jacques Derrida showed how Plato used the word pharmakon to refer both to poison and to cure. In chapter 3, "'Within the infant rind of this weak flower': The Ambivalence of Poison and Medicine," Zhang extends and broadens Derrida's enquiry, finding this precise ambivalence not only in Western writers...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChina review internationalSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207