MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082237314 · doi:10.1115/icnmm2006-96231

Finite Element Modelling of Blood Flow in Artery Stenosis

2006· article· en· W2082237314 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Navraj Hanspal, Keigi Fujiwara, Michael R. King

Bibliographic record

VenueASME 4th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels, Parts A and B · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsFinite element methodDiscretizationMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Navier–Stokes equationsBlood flowMathematicsConstitutive equationGalerkin methodNewtonian fluidCompressibilityMathematical analysisPhysicsThermodynamicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent work by our laboratories suggest that the endothelial cells that line blood vessels respond dramatically to shear stress gradients over millimeter and micrometer length scales, contributing to the progression of the atherosclerosis disease state. In this paper, we present a CFD model for the prediction and quantitative analyses of the hemodynamic behavior of blood flow in stenosed arteries of a guinea pig, comprised of a nearly axisymmetric vessel constriction. The blood is considered to be incompressible and the flow model is described by the Navier-Stokes and the continuity equations. A standard Galerkin finite element technique has been applied for the solution of the flow equations within a 2-D axisymmetric framework. Elemental discretization is based on the use of C0- continuous Taylor-Hood type isoparametric finite elements that are used for the approximation of the unknown field variables. An implicit-theta time-stepping scheme has been chosen for the temporal discretization of the flow equations. The rheological behaviour of blood is incorporated within the main flow model through the use of different non-Newtonian constitutive equations. Relationships of the stenosis severity and flow data such as flow rate and flow pressure are obtained from the numerical simulations. The results are presented in the form of velocity vectors and pressure surface plots and are examined for stability, convergence and theoretical consistency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME 4th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels, Parts A and BSame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207