MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082238789 · doi:10.1190/1.1444798

Near-surface VSP surveys using the seismic cone penetrometer

2000· article· en· W2082238789 on OpenAlexafffund
Kevin Jarvis, Rosemary Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVertical seismic profileGeologyPenetrometerBoreholeSeismologyDeconvolutionGeophonePassive seismicGeodesyGeotechnical engineeringSoil scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We have found that high-quality vertical seismic profile (VSP) data can be collected for near-surface applications using the seismic cone penetrometer. Cone-mounted accelerometers are used as the VSP receivers, and a sledgehammer against the cone truck base plate is used as a source. This technique eliminates the need to drill a borehole, thereby reducing the cost of the survey, and results in a less invasive means of obtaining VSP data. Two SH-wave VSP surveys were acquired over a deltaic sand/silt sequence and compared to an SH-wave common-depth-point (CDP) reflection profile. The VSP data were processed using a combination of singular-value-decomposition filtering, deconvolution, and f-k filtering to produce the final VSP extracted traces. The VSP traces correlate well with cone geotechnical logs and the CDP surface-seismic data. The first breaks from the VSP can be used to generate shear-wave velocity profiles that are important for time-to-depth conversion and the velocity correction of the CDP surface data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207