MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082253768 · doi:10.1002/humu.22019

Improved diagnostics lead to identification of three new patients with congenital disorder of glycosylation-Ip

2011· article· en· W2082253768 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Thiel, Nina Rind, Diana Popovici, Georg F. Hoffmann, Kristen Hanson, Robert L. Conway, Craig R. Adamski, Elizabeth Butler, Rhonda Scanlon, Marie Lambert, N. Apeshiotis, Charlotte Thiels, Gert Matthijs, Christian Körner

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Mutation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsBiologyGlycosylationIdentification (biology)Lead (geology)Computational biologyBioinformaticsGeneticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) comprise a clinically and biochemically heterogeneous group of monogenetic-inherited, multisystemic diseases that affect the biosynthesis of N- and/or O-glycans linked to glycoconjugates. Recently, we identified the first patient with a defect in the cytosolic-orientated GDP-mannose:Man(3-4) GlcNAc(2)-PP-dolichol alpha-1,2-mannosyltransferase (ALG11), who presented an accumulation of shortened dolichol-linked oligosaccharides leading to CDG-Ip (ALG11-CDG). Here we describe an improved metabolic labeling method that allowed the identification of three new CDG-Ip cases that were missed so far in routine diagnostics. Although all CDG-Ip patients carry different mutations in the ALG11 gene, they share a variety of clinical syndromes like an unremarkable prenatal period followed by developmental delay, psychomotor, and mental retardation, strabismus convergens and seizures occurring in the first year of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman MutationSame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207