MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082255565 · doi:10.1063/1.3339020

Effect of Fe partial substitution for Co on the magnetic properties of Y(Co,Fe)5 from first-principles

2010· article· en· W2082255565 on OpenAlexaff
Xubo Liu, Z. Altounian, Mufei Yue

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties of Alloys
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetizationLattice constantMagnetic momentChemistryCondensed matter physicsDensity functional theoryLattice (music)Materials scienceCrystallographyMagnetic fieldComputational chemistryPhysicsDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structure, magnetization and exchange interaction in Y(Co1−xFex)5 with x=0 to 0.3 are studied from a first-principles density functional calculation. The cohesive energy calculations indicate that Fe prefers to occupy the 3g site and the lattice constants increase with Fe Content. The magnetization increases from 7.50 to 8.97μB with increasing x from 0 to 0.3 as the calculations show that Fe has a much larger moment (about 2.4μB) than that of Co (about 1.5μB). The exchange parameters between Fe and Co are larger than those for Co–Co and Fe–Fe pairs, and are responsible for the higher TC of Y(Co1−xFex)5. The estimated TC from the calculated exchange parameters increases from about 1065 to 1298 K with increasing x from 0 to 0.3 using a multisublattices mean-field model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMagnetic Properties of AlloysFrench-language works237,207