<em>L'épreuve de la béance: l'écriture nomade chez Hédi Bouraoui</em>, by Abderrahman Beggar
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: L’épreuve de la béance: l’écriture nomade chez Hédi Bouraoui Cynthia T. Hahn L’épreuve de la béance: l’écriture nomade chez Hédi Bouraoui by Abderrahman Beggar New Orleans: Presses Universitaires du Nouveau Monde, 2009. 109 pp. ISBN 1-931948-78-X paper. As author Abdelraahman Beggar suggests in his introduction, Hédi Bouraoui’s writing resists classification with regard to specific national identity or literary movement. His life and writing are infused with movement and cultural confrontation, from Tunisia, to Europe and now Canada, where he taught for decades at York University. This incredibly prolific author-scholar, who has received eleven literary prizes and published over fifty books of prose and poetry and over one hundred articles, claims an absolute right to freedom of expression and style, defying the notion of the defining line or border. This need for displacement of the “Moi” in his work finds its expression in the figure of the nomad, one who destroys all “altars, icons or obstacles, for a clear view of the horizon”; Beggar notes that Bouraoui’s writing is an esthetic and migratory “glorification of displacement from the white space of the blank page” (4). Liberating the self, from both its sense and subject, describes the process by which Bouraoui deconstructs signifiers in order to dislodge their assigned phonemic and semantic meanings, producing “revolutions” through his expression of the world (5). Beggar uses examples from fifteen works of poetry and prose by Bouraoui to explicate the process of this migratory literary self. Beggar notes that the nomadic aspect of Bouraoui’s work is not about abolishing cultural difference, or about “orientalizing” or “Occidentalizing,” but rather recognizing and respecting Otherness in order to go beyond it (7). Beggar describes Bouraoui’s conception of the human being as a totality within the open space (“la béance”) of the circle and not as a creature locked in binarity. Rather, the aspects of “attitude” and drive (“élan”) are integral to the creation of one’s being and through which one may move and change (7–8). Beggar suggests a reading of Bouraoui’s texts in light of Lacan’s “Grand Autre,” or Other, as a way to qualify the aspect of “béance” so prevalent in his work, this “Nothingness that is a prelude to Being” (8). In addition [End Page 157] to Lacan, Foucault, Kant, and Deleuze, Beggar’s discussion draws from some sixty secondary sources that include psychoanalysts, philosophers, historians, anthropologists, and literary critics. In the first section, “Béance et instinct de mort,” Bouraoui’s works Tremblé, Retour à Thyna, and La pharaone are discussed in light of the thematic of martyr and victim, and characters contesting “historical destiny,” while “re-creating” it. Beggar notes the author’s subversion of the classic linearity of historical novels, where the past determines a hero’s present actions. The second part, “Béance et altérité,” demonstrates how Bouraoui negotiates aspects of Otherness related to the marginal spaces of mental and physical handicaps. “Béance et nomaditude,” the third section, draws attention to ideas of self and cultural re-creation, to creative drive as a liberating force, as discussed in Bouraoui’s collection, Transpoétique. Eloge du nomadisme (Montréal; Mémoire d’encrier, col. “Essai,” 2005). This thin but remarkably dense essay (with index) is accessible to those with a working knowledge of psychoanalytic criticism, and Beggar’s analysis aptly captures the essence of Bouraoui’s literary and critical corpus. Cynthia T. Hahn Lake Forest College Hahn@lakeforest.edu Copyright © 2010 Indiana University Press
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it