Review of studies on geometrically nonlinear vibrations and dynamics of circular cylindrical shells and panels, with and without fluid-structure interaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This literature review focuses mainly on geometrically nonlinear (finite amplitude) free and forced vibrations of circular cylindrical shells and panels, with and without fluid-structure interaction. Work on shells and curved panels of different geometries is but briefly discussed. In addition, studies dealing with particular dynamical problems involving finite deformations, eg, dynamic buckling, stability, and flutter of shells coupled to flowing fluids, are also discussed. This review is structured as follows: after a short introduction on some of the fundamentals of geometrically nonlinear theory of shells, vibrations of shells and panels in vacuo are discussed. Free and forced vibrations under radial harmonic excitation (Section 2.2), parametric excitation (axial tension or compression and pressure-induced excitations) (Section 2.3), and response to radial transient loads (Section 2.4) are reviewed separately. Studies on shells and panels in contact with dense fluids (liquids) follow; some of these studies present very interesting results using methods also suitable for shells and panels in vacuo. Then, in Section 4, shells and panels in contact with light fluids (gases) are treated, including the problem of stability (divergence and flutter) of circular cylindrical panels and shells coupled to flowing fluid. For shells coupled to flowing fluid, only the case of axial flow is reviewed in this paper. Finally, papers dealing with experiments are reviewed in Section 5. There are 356 references cited in this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".