Non-constant Tumour Blood Flow&Implications for Therapy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the past few years, 'perfusion-limited' hypoxia caused by intermittent decreases in tumour blood flow has received increasing attention. Little effort, however, has gone into characterizing the nature, magnitude or duration of these changes, or their functional significance other than as modifiers of radiotherapy. We have therefore undertaken multiple, quantitative analyses of tumour blood flow in human tumour xenograft systems, and rigorously examined the ramifications of transient blood flow changes. Tumour blood flow in these experimental tumours is much less constant than has previously been assumed, and not only impacts on response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, but also on the more fundamental processes of tumour growth and repopulation. Notably, responses entirely consistent with the laboratory results have been seen in our initial studies of human tumours sequentially biopsied during treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it