MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082329054 · doi:10.1063/1.2820384

Deep periodic domain inversions in x-cut LiNbO3 and its use for second harmonic generation near 1.5μm

2007· article· en· W2082329054 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut National d'Optique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithium niobatePolingSecond-harmonic generationMaterials scienceFabricationPotassium niobateOpticsPenetration depthOptoelectronicsNear-infrared spectroscopyOptical materialsIsotropic etchingCrystal (programming language)Nonlinear opticsEtching (microfabrication)FerroelectricityNanotechnologyLaserPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we report the fabrication of deep x-cut periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) crystal. The technique relies on ridges performed by wet etching to improve poling field penetration into the substrate and, hence, to provide more depth to inverted domains. Based on this approach, domain inversions as deep as 6.5μm were achieved. As an application, reverse proton exchanged waveguides were fabricated on top of the PPLN to demonstrate efficient second harmonic generation in the near infrared. A conversion efficiency as high as 46%W−1cm−2 was measured near 1.5μm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it