MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082378089 · doi:10.1159/000261185

Studies on Fluoride Excretion in Human Whole Saliva and Its Relation to Flow Rate and Plasma Fluoride Levels

2009· article· en· W2082378089 on OpenAlexaff
A. Oliveby, F. Lagerlöf, Jan Ekstrand, C. Dawes

Bibliographic record

VenueCaries Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFluoride Effects and Removal
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
KeywordsSalivaFluorideChemistryIngestionStimulationEndocrinologyWhole bloodInternal medicineBiochemistryMedicineInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Five volunteers participated in two separate experiments where whole saliva was collected without stimulation or with stimulation by chewing on paraffin wax. The saliva was collected continuously for 120 min after ingestion of 1 mg fluoride as NaF. Blood was collected at intervals throughout the experiments. The results showed that the concentration of fluoride in whole saliva mirrored the fluoride concentration in plasma, but at a lower level. Variations in salivary flow rate (0.34 +/- 0.15 ml/min for unstimulated and 1.06 +/- 0.28 ml/min for stimulated) did not affect the salivary fluoride concentration. The amount of fluoride excreted into stimulated whole saliva was significantly correlated with the salivary flow rate, with a correlation coefficient of 0.98. The fraction of the ingested fluoride dose recovered in whole saliva within 2 h was 0.05 +/- 0.02 and 0.18 +/- 0.09% for the unstimulated and the stimulated whole saliva, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCaries ResearchSame topicFluoride Effects and RemovalFrench-language works237,207