Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le thème de la kénose de Dieu traverse une bonne partie de la littérature chrétienne ancienne, en particulier les évangiles canoniques. L’article explore ce motif à partir d’un passage de l’Évangile de Jean (chapitre 20), pour montrer comment le motif de la kénose est mis en acte, à travers les figures de Marie de Magdala et du Christ et, plus généralement, pour réfléchir à la notion d’intrigue et de représentation de la réalité. Cette réflexion se fonde sur la Poétique d’Aristote qui présente une première théorisation du récit. L’objectif est tout d’abord de percevoir quelles sont les formes sous lesquelles se présente le thème de la kénose, pour en développer les implications. Ensuite, forme et fond étant liés, de comprendre comment s’élabore une écriture de la kénose dans le christianisme ancien et quels sont les procédés littéraires utilisés pour l’exprimer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".