MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082420333 · doi:10.1109/ecce.2012.6342167

Three phase common-mode winding voltage elimination in a three-limb five-level coupled inductor inverter

2012· article· en· W2082420333 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey Ewanchuk, Raez Ul Haque, Andrew M. Knight, John Salmon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInductorElectromagnetic coilInverterConvertersPulse-width modulationCommon-mode signalVoltageModulation (music)Three-phaseEngineeringElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Computer sciencePhysicsAcousticsDigital signal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In three phase converters that use interleaved switching, coupled inductors between modules can be used to create a multi-level PWM output. To save weight, these coupled inductors can be integrated together to use a single three-limb core, but the presence of common mode voltages across the three-phase windings significantly reduce the converter performance. In this paper, a space vector based approach is used to eliminate these common mode winding voltages, allowing efficient three-limb coupled inductor operation at standard industrial switching frequencies, e.g. 3 kHz. This modulation approach is applied to a five-level neutral point clamped coupled inductor inverter (NPC-CII) and is intended to allow the use of lower frequency, higher powered devices. The proposed approach is compared against an interleaved modulation scheme that does not incorporate common mode winding elimination, and a 10 kW NPC-CII experimental prototype is used to confirm operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207