MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082436593 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-3546

Abstract 3546: Role of the “1C” Aldo-Keto Reductases in Resistance to Doxorubicin in MCF-7 breast cancer cells

2010· article· en· W2082436593 on OpenAlexaff
Allan D. Heibein, Jason A. Sprowl, David A. MacLean, Amadeo M. Parissenti

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAldose Reductase and Taurine
Canadian institutionsSudbury Regional HospitalNOSM UniversityLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMCF-7DoxorubicinAnthracyclineEpirubicinCancer researchCancer cellDaunorubicinPharmacologyChemistryBiologyCancerMedicineInternal medicineBreast cancerChemotherapyHuman breast

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Metabolism of anthracyclines by members of the aldo-keto reductase (AKR) family of enzymes presents a potential mechanism of drug resistance by converting anthracyclines such as daunorubicin, doxorubicin, or epirubicin to less cytotoxic 13′-OH metabolites. The exact mechanism and relative role of AKRs in anthracycline resistance remains unclear. Changes in anthracycline sensitivity may, in part, be the result of altered expression of AKRs in anthracycline-resistant cancers. Anthracycline-resistant cell lines were created in our laboratory by selection of MCF-7 cells for survival in increasing doses of doxorubicin (MCF-7DOX-2) or epirubicin (MCF-7EPI). “Co-cultured control” MCF-7CC cell lines were also created by an identical selection procedure in the absence of drug. Drug resistance relative to MCF-7CC cells was established at a specific threshold dose, after which the magnitude of resistance increased with increasing selection dose. Microarray and confirmatory Q-PCR studies revealed that AKR1C2 and AKR1C3 transcripts were overexpressed in MCF-7DOX2 and MCF-7EPI lines relative to MCF-7CC cells at or above the threshold dose. At the highest selection dose, the AKR1C2/3 inhibitor 5β-cholanic acid (5βC) almost completely restored sensitivity to doxorubicin in MCF-7DOX2 cells, but had little effect on MCF-7EPI and MCF-7CC cells. HPLC analysis showed altered intracellular levels of doxorubicin in MCF-7DOX2 and MCF-7EPI relative to MCF-7CC. Upon addition of 5βC, intracellular levels of doxorubicin increased in MCF-7CC and MCF-7DOX2 but not in MCF-7EPI cells (p < 0.05), likely due to the strong overexpression of the Abcb1 drug exporter in the latter cell line. Surprisingly, cellular levels of doxorubicinol (the 13′-OH metabolite of doxorubicin) were undetectable by HPLC in all cell lines. Laser scanning confocal microscopy further revealed that, in contrast to its nuclear location in MCF-7CC cells, doxorubicin was found primarily outside the nucleus when added to MCF-7DOX-2 and MCF-7EPI cells. Doxorubicinol, on the other hand, remained extra-nuclear in all three cell lines (in the absence or presence of 5βC). Doxorubicin localization to the nucleus was restored in MCF-7DOX-2 cells (but not MCF-7EPI cells) upon addition of 5βC. Doxorubicin stained isolated nuclei from MCF-7CC cells much more strongly than doxorubicinol; consistent with this finding, doxorubicin showed a higher DNA binding affinity than doxorubicinol in a fluorescent intercalator displacement assay. Taken together, our findings suggest that selection of breast tumour cells for anthracycline resistance results in overexpression of specific AKR isoforms. These AKRs convert the parent compound entering the cytoplasm to a less toxic 13-OH metabolite, with a lower affinity for DNA. The metabolite may then diffuse from cells or be further metabolized, preventing its detection by HPLC. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3546.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicAldose Reductase and TaurineFrench-language works237,207