Injection-Site Reactions to Booster Doses of Acellular Pertussis Vaccine: Rate, Severity, and Anticipated Impact
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acellular pertussis (aP)-containing vaccines cause fewer adverse events than whole-cell versions for primary doses. Booster doses, however, may be followed by extensive injection-site reactions. This study compares the frequency, severity, and impact of local reactions among children receiving 5 consecutive doses of an aP combination vaccine (including inactivated polio virus, conjugated Haemophilus influenzae type b antigen, and diphtheria and tetanus toxoids) to children receiving a mixed series of whole-cell and aP combination vaccines. METHODS: Participants were parents or guardians of children 4 to 6 years old immunized at public health clinics across British Columbia, Canada. This included 398 children receiving the fifth consecutive dose of an aP combination vaccine and 402 receiving the fifth dose in a mixed series consisting of at least 1 prior dose of whole-cell pertussis combination vaccine with the remainder as aP combination vaccine. A cross-sectional telephone survey evaluated the extent of local reactions 48 to 96 hours after immunization by asking participants to compare the size of redness and swelling with familiar household items such as Oreo cookies or coins. Associated discomfort and impact on recreational activities, health care utilization, parental time off work, and attitudes toward immunization were also assessed. RESULTS: Children who received the fifth consecutive dose of an aP combination vaccine more often experienced redness (24%) or swelling (16%) the size of an Oreo cookie or larger (>or=46 mm) than children given a mixed series (10% and 9%, respectively) but less often experienced tenderness or limitation of movement at the injection site. Related health care utilization was low. There was no discernible effect on participation in recreational activities or parental attitudes toward vaccine; 90% would recommend the same vaccine to others with children of the same age. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that injection-site reactions are more extensive after the fifth consecutive dose of an aP combination vaccine compared with the fifth dose in a mixed series of whole-cell and aP combination vaccines. These reactions are unlikely to affect parental acceptance of immunization recommendations or health care utilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".