MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electrical Conductivity of Semiconducting Tungsten Oxide Glasses

2001· article· en· W2082457652 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (a) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGlass properties and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConductivityPolaronMaterials scienceThermal conductionOxygenOxideElectrical resistivity and conductivityIonTungstenDielectricDispersion (optics)Analytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryComposite materialOptoelectronicsPhysical chemistryOpticsMetallurgyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conductivity measurements of 60WO3–40B2O3 and 40WO3–5Sb2O3–55TeO2 glasses have been carried out as a function of temperature. The results suggest that the conduction occurs by hopping of small polarons. Dielectric measurements of 60WO3–40B2O3 glass show that the temperature behavior could be described in terms of Debye type dispersion. The oxygen sensing properties of 40WO3–5Sb2O3–55TeO2 were also examined. The reduction in its conductivity in oxygen is attributed to the oxidation of W5+ ions to W6+ ions. A large change in the conductivity of this tellurite based glass in oxygen suggests that the glass can be used as a potential oxygen gas sensor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it