MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reductions in Functional Balance, Coordination, and Mobility Measures Among Patients With Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2004· article· en· W2082480573 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosturographyMedicineSpirometryBalance (ability)COPDBalance testPhysical therapyTimed Up and Go testGaitPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicineAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief PURPOSE: To compare measures of balance, coordination, and mobility between patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and healthy control subjects, and to determine whether differences in these measures are associated with measures of disease severity. METHODS: The subjects were divided into three groups: 15 patients with COPD who required the use of supplemental oxygen (WO), 15 patients with COPD who did not require the use of supplemental oxygen (NO), and 21 healthy control subjects (CO). The subjects performed spirometry and several measures of balance, coordination, and mobility including the Community Balance and Mobility Scale, the timed up and go test, the fast-gait speed test, posturography, and both a finger-to-nose test and a toe-tapping coordination test. Significance was set at an alpha less than 0.05. RESULTS: When control was used for age, significant differences were found between the WO group and the CO group for the finger-to-nose test, and for both the sway index and peak sway index for the eyes open, moving-platform test. Differences were found among all three groups for the Community Balance and Mobility Scale overall score. The scores for the WO group were significantly worse than for the NO group on the timed up and go and the fast-gait speed tests. Moderate correlation was found among all of the measures, demonstrating significant differences in forced-expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow, and forced-expiratory volume. When controls were used for both age and FEV1, between-group differences disappeared. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COPD exhibit deficiencies in functional balance, coordination, and mobility tasks associated with disease severity or differences in activity levels, but not in the requirement for supplemental oxygen. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is increasingly recognized as a multisystemic disease. Decreases in peripheral muscle strength or hypoxia may cause reductions in functional performance. Our results showed that COPD patients demonstrated deficiencies in functional balance, coordination, and mobility when compared with healthy controls, and that these deficiencies were associated with disease severity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it