Stereoelectronic and conformational effects on the stereochemical course of reduction of bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane 1,3-diketones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stereoselectivity of the reduction of bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane 1,3-diketones was studied. The experimental data of π-facial stereoselection of the reduction of the carbonyl group were successfully rationalized by the application of the exterior frontier orbital extension (EFOE) model. The observed facial diastereoselectivity of the carbonyl reduction of bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane diketones could be reasonably explained by the ground-state facial anisotropy of the frontier orbital extension, steric effects, and the intrinsic reactivity of carbonyl groups. Although the EFOE density and PDAS values predicted the enhanced reactivity at the C-2 carbonyl compared to C-9 carbonyl, transition-state calculations at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level showed that the reactivity of C-9 and C-2 in a hydride addition to both carbonyl groups should be nearly the same. The EFOE analysis also strongly indicated that in the second hydride reduction step the corresponding oxobicyclononanolates are most likely to be involved in the reduction as the major species rather than the free hydroxyketones. The antiperiplanar effects in the transition states of the LiAlH 4 reduction as measured by both the elongation and the natural bond population of the antiperiplanar bonds clearly indicated they should not be an essential factor of the facial diastereoselection of studied diketones.Key words: bicyclo[3.3.1]nonanedione, EFOE model, reduction, stereoselectivity, transition state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".