MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082507235 · doi:10.1029/2011eo350005

Atomic oxygen emission intensity ratio: Observation and theory

2011· article· en· W2082507235 on OpenAlex
T. G. Slanger, B. D. Sharpee, Dušan A. Pejaković, D. L. Huestis, M. A. Bautista, R. L. Gattinger, E. J. Llewellyn, I. C. McDade, D. E. Siskind, K. Minschwaner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEos · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersRice UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsForcing (mathematics)Value (mathematics)Intensity (physics)Atomic oxygenTheoretical physicsPhysicsStatistical physicsComputer scienceMathematicsOxygenStatisticsQuantum mechanicsAtmospheric sciences

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What constitutes reality: observation or theory? In the search for truth, observations can sometimes diverge from theory, forcing scientists to rethink fundamental approaches and question the idea of what it means for a system to exhibit “standard” behavior. In this Forum we argue that agreement among theoreticians on the numerical value of a particular physical parameter must still withstand the test of observation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it