Atributos para caracterização de plataformas logísticas: estudo de casos na Espanha, Itália e Dinamarca
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plataformas Logísticas são instalações onde diversas empresas executam atividades de transporte, armazenagem, distribuição e produção de mercadorias. As plataformas contribuem para a racionalização dos processos logísticos e podem gerar importantes vantagens competitivas, reduzindo custos e melhorando o nível de serviço das empresas. O objetivo deste estudo é estabelecer os atributos que caracterizam três empreendimentos bem sucedidos com relação a sua implantação e evolução. Através da metodologia de estudo de casos múltiplos foram analisadas duas importantes plataformas logísticas europeias (Plaza em Zaragoza, Espanha e Distrito de Nola, Itália) e um Parque Eco-Industrial (Kalundborg, Dinamarca). Os resultados do estudo contribuem para o entendimento de como estas instalações devem ser implantadas e geridas para alcançar maior eficiência, além de fornecer uma modelo de análise que pode ser aplicado a novos estudos de casos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".