Impact of Constitutional Isomers of (BMes<sub>2</sub>)phenylpyridine on Structure, Stability, Phosphorescence, and Lewis Acidity of Mononuclear and Dinuclear Pt(II) Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The impact of two constitutional isomers, 2-(4-BMes(2)-Ph)-pyridine (p-B-ppy, 1) and 5-BMes(2)-2-ph-pyridine (p-ppy-B, 2), as N,C-chelate ligands on the structures, stabilities, electronic and photophysical properties, and Lewis acidities of Pt(II) complexes has been investigated. Six Pt(II) complexes, Pt(p-B-ppy)Ph(DMSO) (1a), Pt(p-B-ppy)Ph(py) (1b), [Pt(p-B-ppy)Ph](2)(4,4'-bipy) (1c), Pt(p-ppy-B)Ph(DMSO) (2a), Pt(p-ppy-B)Ph(py) (2b), and [Pt(p-ppy-B)Ph](2)(4,4'-bipy) (2c), have been synthesized and fully characterized. The structures of 1a, 1c, 2a, and 2c were established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. All complexes adopt a cis geometry with the phenyl ligand being cis to the phenyl ring of the ppy chelate. The dinuclear complexes 2a and 2c were found to exist in two isomeric forms in solution, syn and anti, with respect to the relative orientation of the two BMes(2) groups in the molecule. While all complexes are stable in solution under ambient air, compound 2a was found to react with H(2)O slowly in solution and form complex 2a-OH, where one of the mesityl groups on the boron center was replaced by an OH group. This instability of 2a is attributed to an internal dimethylsulfoxide-directed hydrolysis process via hydrogen bonds. The electron-accepting ability of the free ligands and the complexes were examined by cyclic voltammetry, establishing that, for p-ppy-B, Pt(II) chelation enhances the electron-accepting ability while, for p-B-ppy, Pt(II) chelation has little impact. All Pt(II) complexes display oxygen-sensitive phosphorescence in solution at ambient temperature, dominated by B-ppy or ppy-B centered pi --> pi* transitions. The Lewis acidity of the complexes was examined by fluoride titration experiments using UV-vis, phosphorescence, and NMR spectroscopic methods, establishing that the p-ppy-B complexes have similar and strong binding constants while the p-B-ppy complexes have a much lower affinity toward F(-), compared to the free ligands. In the dinuclear complexes, weak electronic communication between the two Pt(II) units is evident in 1c but absent in 2c, attributable to the different steric interactions in the two molecules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".