MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Surface Expression of Transglutaminase 2 by Dendritic Cells and its Potential Role for Uptake and Presentation of Gluten Peptides to T Cells

2007· article· en· W2082623176 on OpenAlexaff
Melinda Ráki, Karoline W. Schjetne, Jorunn Stamnæs, Øyvind Molberg, Frode L. Jahnsen, Thomas B. Issekutz, Bjarne Bogen, Ludvig M. Sollid

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Immunology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNorges Forskningsråd
KeywordsTissue transglutaminasePresentation (obstetrics)GlutenCell biologyExpression (computer science)ChemistryBiologyMedicineBiochemistryEnzymeComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Celiac disease is a chronic small intestinal inflammation driven by gluten-reactive T cells of the intestinal mucosa. These T cells are HLA-DQ2 or -DQ8 restricted, and predominantly recognize gluten peptides that are deamidated by the enzyme transglutaminase 2 (TG2). Our recent results strongly suggest that duodenal CD11c(+) dendritic cells (DC) are directly involved in T cell activation in the celiac lesion. The aim of this study was to investigate whether surface-associated TG2 could be involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis of gluten peptides, a process that may contribute to the preferential recognition of deamidated peptides. We found that both monocyte-derived DC and local CD11c(+) DC in the duodenal mucosa expressed cell surface-associated TG2. As phenotypic characterization of CD11c(+) DC in the celiac lesion suggests that these cells may be derived from circulating monocytes, we used monocyte-derived DC in functional in vitro studies. Using a functional T cell assay, we obtained evidence that cell surface-associated TG2 is endocytosed by monocyte-derived DC. However, we were unable to obtain evidence for a role of surface TG2 in the loading and subsequent generation of deamidated gluten peptides in these cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of ImmunologySame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207