Improved Solutions for Porosity and Specific Surface of a Uniform Porous Medium with Attached Film
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Improved solutions for the porosity and specific surface of uniform porous media with the attached film are provided for four regular packing arrangements. These solutions overcome the limitations of previous solutions, which did not cover the full range of film thicknesses to complete occlusion of the pore space in the porous media. The void spaces within the clogged porous media are analyzed geometrically. The exact solutions for the volume and surface area of overlapping shapes and isolated void spaces are formulated in terms of integrals. New polynomial solutions are proposed to replace the numerical integration in the complete solutions to allow easy implementation in numerical models. With the new solutions, both the porosity and specific surface gradually decrease from the initial values to zero when the film increases to complete pore occlusion. These solutions have application in numerical modeling of the growth of organic mass and deposition of inorganic mass in leachate collection systems and other similar systems in which there maybe growth of a semipermeable film on the surface of the particles in a relatively uniformly graded granular porous medium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".